How AI Engines Recommend Products
Where does the list actually come from?
When you ask ChatGPT "what's the best wireless earbuds under $100?", it gives you a list. But where does that list come from? Understanding the mechanics of how AI engines build product recommendations is the first step toward influencing the outcome.
This isn't about gaming the system — it's about making sure accurate, authoritative information about your products is available in the places AI engines actually look.
Training data vs. real-time sources: both matter
Large language models like GPT-4 and Claude have a training data cutoff. Their baseline understanding of which products are good comes from web crawls, reviews, forums, news coverage, and product pages.
But some models don't rely solely on training data. Perplexity is built around real-time web search. ChatGPT with browsing pulls current pages. For these models, what's happening online right now matters as much as historical data.
Key insight
If your brand doesn't have meaningful presence in the authoritative sources AI engines learned from, you won't appear in baseline recommendations — regardless of how good your product is. Building that presence is a long-term investment.
How AI constructs a product recommendation
No AI company publishes a step-by-step breakdown of their recommendation logic. But studying response patterns reveals four consistent mechanisms.
1. Pattern matching
AI identifies which brand names appear most frequently alongside specific product category queries in training data. If Sony, Jabra, and Anker appear millions of times in documents about wireless earbuds, these names become strongly associated with the category. A brand with limited web presence simply doesn't register as a pattern.
2. Source weighting
Not all sources carry equal weight. Specialist review outlets like Wirecutter and RTINGS are treated as authoritative. Large community platforms like Reddit carry weight due to volume and engagement. Official product pages with JSON-LD schema signal credibility directly to AI crawlers.
3. Consensus building
When multiple independent sources agree that Brand X is good for Category Y, AI treats this as closer to established fact. Distributing presence across source types matters more than getting one big mention.
4. Recency signals
For search-enabled models, fresh content can override older training patterns. A major product launch covered by several publications this month can shift AI recommendations faster than years of historical data.
Why ChatGPT and Claude give different answers to the same question
Ask ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity the same product question. You'll often get different brand lists. Each model has different training data, different source hierarchies, and different weighting algorithms.
Answers also change over time within the same model. Model updates, fine-tuning cycles, and shifts in real-time search results cause recommendations to drift.
Practical implication
Performing well on one AI engine doesn't guarantee the same result on others. Monitoring across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity separately gives you the real picture. Tracking just one model leaves significant blind spots.
The cross-border factor: AI recommendations are market-specific
Ask "best sunscreen" in English and you get a list shaped by American beauty publications. Ask in Japanese and the AI draws on Japanese skincare media. Ask in German and you get another list entirely.
AI engines incorporate language-specific sources. A brand with strong English-language presence may have minimal signal in Japanese or German language sources — meaning it won't appear in recommendations for those markets. Optimizing for one language doesn't transfer.
What this means for cross-border sellers
English SEO alone won't get you into Japanese or European AI recommendations. You need authoritative mentions in the target-market language, from sources that carry weight in that region.
What you can actually do about it
AI recommendation algorithms are opaque, but the inputs that feed them are not. Here are concrete steps.
Build presence on authoritative sources in each target market
For the US: Wirecutter, The Verge, relevant Reddit communities. For Japan: local tech media and consumer platforms. Getting reviewed, mentioned, or compared on these sources directly feeds AI training data and real-time search results.
Implement structured data (JSON-LD) on product pages
Schema.org markup gives AI crawlers a structured, machine-readable view of your products — category, price, brand, reviews. Without it, AI has to infer from unstructured text.
Use llms.txt to give AI engines direct brand context
The llms.txt standard lets you publish a file at your domain root telling AI crawlers what your brand does and what products you offer. Think of it as robots.txt for AI — except you're giving context, not blocking access.
Monitor regularly — AI visibility changes without warning
A one-time audit tells you where you stand today, not where you'll be in three months. Tracking which prompts mention your brand, how often, and with what sentiment — across multiple models and markets — turns a snapshot into an actionable signal.
See how your brand shows up in AI
Monitor how AI engines recommend your products across global markets.
Start for Free